The
best bone marrow transplant is still a topic under analysis. We know now that
this type of transplant is a surgical procedure used to replace damaged or
destroyed bone marrow with healthy bone marrow stem cells. But what does it
involve and how can we choose the method that is best in bone marrow
transplant? Below you will find some pro’s and con’s.
Before
embryonic stem cells, doctors were using hematopoietic – that is, blood-forming
— stem cells. Hematopoietic stem cells can restore all the cells types in the
blood, used as treatment for diseases such as multiple myeloma or leukemia.
They can come either from the marrow of a donor’s hip bone, or indirectly from
the donor’s blood after a drug pushes the stem cells out of the bone marrow.
Most
hematopoietic stem cell transplants use the indirect method of obtaining the
stem cells. Yet there is not enough data to say for certain that one or the
other method fits best for the best patient outcomes. A couple of years back, a
study was released addressing this question.
The
study found no significant difference. The overall survival rate was at two
years, and no difference was found in the relapse rates but there was a higher
rate of chronic GVHD with the use of blood stem cells. The disease is a
difficult and sometimes deadly complication for this type of transplant. It involves
damage for the recipient’s new immune system upon the liver, skin and digestive
system. Apparently, this was an issue that made doctors opt for the first as
the best bone marrow transplant.
The
finding generated serious discussion among leaders in the transplant field
about whether bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is a
better treatment option.
The
study for the best bone marrow transplant options only enrolled patients with
myelodysplastic syndrome and acute leukemia. It excluded patients with lymphoma
or myeloma. Ages included children, adults up to 60.
No comments:
Post a Comment